人人书

杂志

保存到桌面 | 繁体人人书 | 手机版
传记回忆文学理论侦探推理惊悚悬疑诗歌戏曲杂文随笔小故事书评杂志
人人书 > 杂志 > What’s Next for the U.S.?

What’s Next for the U.S.?

时间:2024-11-05 03:17:35

BothBritain’s“softBrexit”tacticandtheUnitedStates’escalatingdisputeswithitsmajorglobaltradingpartnersarechangingglobalizationtrends.TheTrumpadministration’stradefightsmay,likeBrexit,ultimatelyproduceresultsthatareoppositetowhatwasdesired.

ChineseandU.S.teams,ledbyChineseVicePremierLiuHeandU.S.SecretaryofCommerceWilburRoss,heldeconomicandtradeconsultationsinBeijingonJune3,2018.byDingHaitao/XinhuaSoonaftertheColdWarended,theWorldTradeOrganization(WTO)wasfoundedinApril1994,andtheUnitedKingdomandtheUnitedStatesbecameleadersofglobalization.Amere24yearslater,thesituationhaschangeddramatically:BritainandtheUnitedStateshavebecomeleadersofde-globalization.

Whatexactlyisde-globalization?Britain’scurrentpolicy,popularlyknownasBrexit,istheprocessofleavingtheEuropeanUnion(EU).TheUnitedStates,ontheotherhand,isstirringuptradedisputeswithitslargesttradingpartnersandevenlaunchinga“tradewar.”

De-globalizationdoesnotrefertocompleterejectionofglobalization,butadvocacyforadjustmentofitsrelationshipwiththeexistingandpreviousglobalizationtrends.Thisadjustmentwillundoubtedlyaffectdomesticandinternationaleconomies,leadingto“trade(investment)diversion”and“trade(investment)creation.”

Twooptionsforde-globalizationhaveemergedsofar:softde-globalizationandhardde-globalization.

ForBritain,thewhitepaperpublishedbytheBritishcabinetonJuly12showsthatBritainhasmadeagreatcompromiseintheprocessofBrexit,themainsymbolofde-globalization:ithaschosentoadopta“softBrexit.”Thewhitepaperproposedtocreatea“freetradeareaforgoods”withtheEU,sothatBritaincancontinuetoaligncommodityrulesandstandardsandestablishclosecustomsarrangementswiththeremaining27EUmembercountries.TheBritishgovernmenthopestoparticipateinEUinstitutionsincludingtheEuropeanAviationSafetyAgencyandEuropeandrugagenciesandwillaccepttherulesandcostsoftheseinstitutions.

ThehopeisthatasBritainfirmlyleavestheEU,itwillestablishanewpartnershipwiththeEUatthesametime.

Thewhitepapersetsoutablueprintfortheso-called“softBrexit.”BritainmayformallyleavetheEU,butinessencewillstillmaintainmostofthesubstantiverelationswiththeEU,especiallyintradeandeconomicfields.

WhatenlightenmentdoestheBrexitwhitepaperprovidefortheunderstandingofthe“tradewar”launchedbytheTrumpadministration?Firstofall,“softBrexit”isabigcompromiseon“de-globalization,”whichsuggeststhatBritishpoliticiansareawareofthehighcostof“economicnationalism”and,toacertainextent,havegivenupthepolicyof“throwingthebabyoutwiththebathwater.”

LikeBrexit,theUnitedStates’tradewarisactuallyjustabreakfromtheexistinginternationalgovernancesystemandarrangements.Bycontrast,BritainhasalreadycompromisedontheissueofBrexit.WilltheUnitedStatesfollowwithcompromiseinthetradewar?

TheanswerdependsonhowmanypeopleintheUnitedStatessupporttheTrumpadministration’s“tradewar”proposal.Americawillholditsmid-termelectionsinNovemberthisyear,whichwilltesthowmuchdomesticsupportthereisforTrump’s“tradewar.”Beforetheelections,unfortunately,theTrumpadministrationisbettingwiththelivelihoodsofpeopleacrosstheUnitedStatesandaroundtheworld,hopingtowinAmericanvotersbyattackingitstradingpartners.

IfmostpeopleintheUnitedStatesendupsupportingthe“tradewar”oftheTrumpadministration,theUnitedStateswilllikelyrefusetocompromisewithChinaandtheEUandcontinuetowagethe“tradewar”untilitstradingpartnersmakeconcessions.

IfTrump’sRepublicanPartymakesnobreakthroughsorevenfailsinthemid-termelections,althoughtheTrumpadministrationisdissatisfiedwithBritain’ssoftretreat,its“tradewar”strategywillgraduallymovetowardscompromise.

Presently,theTrumpadministrationhasfailedtoresumetradenegotiationswithothertradingpartnerssuchasChina,butcontinuestointensifythe“tradewar.”However,becauseAmericanproducersandconsumersarealreadyfeelingadverseeffectsofthe“tradewar,”somemembersoftheTrumpadministrationhaveshownnewsignsofwillingnesstocompromise.Forexample,atahearingoftheFinancialServiceForumonJuly13,U.S.TreasurySecretaryStevenMnuchinstatedthattheadditionaltariffsimposedbytheUnitedStatesonChinesegoodswasonlyatradedispute,nota“tradewar.”HepredictedChinaandtheUnitedStateswillresumetradenegotiations,butonlyontheprerequisitethattheChinesegovernmentiswillingtomakemajoradjustments.

Ofcourse,thesituationisnotsosimplethatBritain’s“softBrexit”couldinspiretheendoftheU.S.tradewar.Iftradedisputesarenotworththegainor“economicpatriotism”isnotapplauded,theTrumpadministrationwillreturntothenegotiatingtable.Beforethattime,ChinaneedstoprepareforfuturenegotiationswiththeTrumpadministration.

TheauthorisaprofessorofinternationalrelationsattheOceanUniversityofChina.
   

热门书籍

热门文章